FFR chose to
test only high quality synthetic oils. High quality synthetics are each oil makers' top
product and high quality synthetics are "most relevant" to performance
enthusiasts. The testers ran each oil through a "short yet grueling" dynamometer
session followed by professional oil analysis.
Sam Blumenstein, of COME Racing, performed the dyno testing on his SuperFlow engine
dynamometer using a mildly modified five liter V8. Bill Reid, of Lubrication Management,
performed the oil analyses. Ryco supplied oil filters.
After establishing baseline performance using a mineral oil, the test team subjected the
test oils to three timed sessions at high engine loads, between each of which were three
full-power runs.
"The intent," says FFR
, "was to establish a number of criteria. Firstly, whether any of the oils would
improve horsepower; whether any of the products would lose viscosity; evaluate [the]
ability (or lack thereof) to prematurely wear components or suffer from discoloration. As
it turned out, discoloration didnt prove to be a factor.
"We approached ten oil suppliers/manufacturers, informing them of our intention, and
all were reasonably keen and eager to be involved, although Pennzoildidnt want to commit and Penriteflat
out said no a little strange given this company has actually advertised with and
for this [performance] market."
The oil probe
is placed in a solution to free it of all oil, leaving behind just the raw wear particles.
Once the magnet is clean, a piece of cellophane tape is applied to stick any metal
particles for analysis either on a contrasting background or under a microscope.
Viscosity Test
FFR first subjected the oils to a
test of viscosity retention. "Note," writes FFR , "that being such a
short test it was felt that none of the oils would lose any of its viscosity rating, and
indeed six oils suffered an inconsequential loss of less than one percent." The other
five, Torco MPZ, Shell
Helix Ultra, Shell Helix Plus, Hi-Tec HTOand Castrol Rsuffered
significant viscosity losses
AMSOIL Series 2000 Synthetic 20W-50 Racing Oil
NO VISCOSITY LOSS REPORTED
Oil
Product
Viscosity Loss
Type
Test #
Torco
MPZ
18%
Synthetic
5 & 6
Shell
Helix Ultra
14%
Synthetic
8
Shell
Helix Plus
12%
Petroleum
1
Hi-Tec
HTO
8%
Synthetic
9
Castrol
R
6%
Synthetic
12
FFR points out that
the loss of viscosity suffered by the five oils was very rapid. "Under normal
conditions its suggested oil which loses viscosity this quickly would be subject to
significant losses over 5000 km [8045 miles]. Indeed, one would be suspect of the
potential for increased wear over this period."
Wear Metal Test
Oils inhibit wear by inhibiting metal to metal
contact of engine parts. To test each oils ability to protect parts from contact and
wear, FFR subjected each oil to a test of wear metal generation. Their test
"indicates the size and number of wear particles for each oil. The higher the rating
the greater number and size of wear particles," writes FFR .
AMSOIL Series 2000
Synthetic 20W-50 Racing Oil had the
LOWEST WEAR METAL GENERATION
Rating
Oil
Average particle size
Overall (micron)
Test #
#1
Amsoil Series 2000
5-10 micron
5-50 micron
10
#2
Hi-Tec HTO
15-20 micron
10-60 micron
9
#3
BP Visco 5000
15-20 micron
15-60 micron
4
#4
Shell Helix Ultra
15-25 micron
15-60 micron
8
#5
Shell Helix Plus
10-20 micron
15-50 Micron
1
#6
Mobil 1 5W-50
20-25 micron
15-60 micron
3
#7
Mobile 1 OW-40
15-20 micron
15-50 micron
11
#8
Castrol R
20-30 micron
15-100 Micron
12
#9
Torco
15-20 micron
15-100 Micron
5 & 6
#10
Royal Purple
15-20 micron
15-100 Micron
7
#11
Castrol SLX
20-25 micron
15-100 Micron
2
Horsepower
FFR averaged
three runs per oil, noting power figures at 500 rpm increments between 3000 and 5000 rpm
and noting peak power and torque. While the engine FFR used for testing was a large
tolerance engine for which a 20W-50 grade oil is ideal, some of the oil manufacturers
supplied 0W-30 grade oils for testing. The low grade viscosity oils delivered somewhat
greater horsepower than the high grade oils did, but as FFR notes, "around
4000 rpm the power produced is very similar across the range and its only really the
top end where there are substantial differences. That said, the AMSOIL [20W-50], Castrol
R [10W-60] and Mobil 5W-50 prove themselves very well."
CONCLUSION
Although weve provided criteria to pick and choose an
oil, the stand-out to us appears to be the AMSOIL, rating well in the viscosity and
producing good horsepower.
With the variety of grades, use this test as a guide but always
follow the manufacturers recommendation.But
if we were to stick our neck out in anticipation of the lawsuits, from the information we
gathered specific to the supplied oils in the test, wed rate the oils in the
following order:
1)AMSOIL
2)BP Visco 5000
3)Mobil 1
4)Mobil 1 (difference being price)
5)Hi-Tec HTO
6)Shell Helix Ultra
7)Royal Purple
8)Castrol R
9)Castrol SLX
10)Torco
AMSOIL Automotive Applications
A few
people who have read the synthetic oil comparison and dyno-test have asked why Redline was
not included.The dyno-test and comparison
was done by Fast Fours and Rotaries magazine and not by AMSOIL.They chose the oils to compare and Im not
sure why Redline was not included.
So for
additional comparison info, I have included the following chart with the most recent
results of the 4-Ball Wear Test for AMSOIL Synthetic 20W-50 (TRO) and Redline 20W-50.
AMSOIL
Synthetic 20W-50 (TRO) outperforms Redline 20W-50 in the 4-Ball Wear Test.
The 4-Ball Wear Test is a good indication of the wear
protection provided by an oil under severe conditions.The smaller the wear scar, the better the protection.
Four-Ball
Wear Test (ASTM D4172)
60 kg pressure @ 150°C, 1800 RPM, 1 hour